12 Comments

I am leaning towards the theory that the mRNA injection is a part of the mark.

I don’t think that once it’s fully installed and implemented that those who received it will be able to make any decisions other than what the “beast” prescribes. Last paragraph of this article says it better than I can. https://open.substack.com/pub/jimychanga/p/meet-the-fockers?r=pr2e8&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Expand full comment

Worshipping the beast comes before the acceptance of the mark. The majority of the population will worship the beast before the mark is imposed on them so theoretically they could possibly be saved up to that point.

Expand full comment

The taking and giving of a mark signifies ownership...like branding cattle. Only the owner is authorized to give the mark and only a worshipper of the owner would willingly accept the mark. The mark of the beast is a complete repudiation of God and the ultimate symbol and demonstrable action of unbelief.

The other factor against the ability to repent is the time frame of the mark. If it is given and accepted after the Holy Spirit and the Church has been taken from the earth it will be impossible for worshippers of the beast to be saved.

Expand full comment

Worship of the beast alone may be a forgivable sin, but the taking of his mark will not be.

Rev 14:9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,

10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:

Expand full comment